We had discussed in class, the differences in "Active Racism" and "Passive Racism" and how a person would fall in one category in contemporary society. It was mentioned that if a person does not actively work to "fight" racism then he/she is not part of the solution but part of the problem. I respectfully would disagree to that idea. There are some who are actually against racism but wish to do their part passively or not as direct. Such examples would be not participating in racist like behavior or discussions. If this is at least done then its shows some attitude of anti-racism.
One way to look at it is when given the opportunity to help someone or a group of people of a different race against racism, one might be willing to help in a matter that's reasonable and they are capable of doing. For example. I would not mind signing a petition, donating money or spread awareness of help to fight against racism for a particular ethnic group. That would be my part of actively or passively being anti-racist. However, if something were to be asked of me where I lose something or an opportunity of great value, such as the hypothetical apartment situation mentioned in class, then I probably would not participate at the current time as actively. Regardless of my capability or decision as to how much I should participate against racism, should be met with respect and understanding. Like most people, I would take great offense to be labeled as racist for only passively participating against anti-racism. I believe, people are willing to help one another as long as we do not see danger or a lost on our part.
It all seems to depend upon how we are defining racism. Some may argue that any anti-racist action would be considered active. It seems like passive anti-racism would apply to individuals who do not believe in racism but do not voice their opinion or do nothing about it. You make the important that we need to combat racism in a realistic way and that realistic actions should not be conceived as passive.
ReplyDelete